Environmental pollution
| Dell’s 2006 Solar Car Race The Dell-Winston Solar Car Challenge will host 18 high school solar race teams from the United States, India, and Puerto Rico that hand-built their road-ready solar cars. |
| Environmental pollution We all need to be concerned about environmental pollution these days, and some of us do a better job than others. Air pollution is a nasty epidemic! |
| Solar shingles Solar shingles are an incredible breakthrough in the solar energy market. They appear to be regular shingles but they contain thin film photovoltaic cells which harness solar power. |
| Geothermal heating and cooling Geothermal heating and cooling systems use the earth to provide up to 50 percent of a building’s total heating and cooling needs. |
| Home energy woes Buying a house is a huge investment.buying a home with a bad energy structure is a big investment too. |
| Hydro Electricity Hydro electricity is electric power generated by moving water. Hydro electricity is renewable and cheap. |
| Solar power energy Solar power energy has always been available. Until now, we have not learned to harness solar power energy. |
| ‘Catch share’ process can help fisheries Johanna Thomas is director of fisheries projects for the Pacific Ocean program of the Environmental Defense Fund. This piece was originally published as a Johanna Thomas is director of fisheries projects for the Pacific Ocean program of the Environmental Defense Fund. This piece was originally published as a Special to the May 6, 2008 Editorials section.If you’ve bought wild salmon recently you undoubtedly got hit with some serious sticker shock. Retail prices have nearly doubled from last year because the fish have largely disappeared off the California coast. If you’re a fisherman, the shock is worse: Salmon is off limits to recreational and commercial harvests, leaving fishermen in a state of crisis. Unfortunately, the problems aren’t just limited to salmon. Other fisheries such as Pacific rockfish, marketed as "red snapper," are also in trouble.West Coast landings of rockfish or groundfish plunged by 70 percent during the last two decades, from an average of 74,000 tons in the 1980s to 22,214 tons in 2007. Revenues from the groundfish fell by more than half from 1997 to 2007, from $47.3 million to $22.2 million. In 2000, the U.S. Department of Commerce declared the fishery a disaster, due to major declines in nine of 82 species of groundfish. Today, the Pacific Fishery Management Council, which governs West Coast fishing, lists seven species of rockfish as overfished.The problem is not the fishermen. Fishermen have done everything that fishery managers have asked them to do. With fisheries continuing to fail, perhaps now is the time to reconsider the direction we’ve been taking with fishery management.On June 8, the Pacific Fishery Management Council, one of eight regional councils governing fishing in U.S. waters, will meet in California on the future of Pacific groundfish. The council has an opportunity to incorporate management measures for harvesting Pacific groundfish that have worked well to recover fisheries in other regions. Opportunities to make fishing more profitable and sustainable also will be considered during a hearing today of the Joint Legislative Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture in the Legislature’s annual Fisheries Forum.Historically, fishery management councils have responded to crisis through measures such as shorter fishing seasons and smaller daily limits. Instead of reducing the catch as intended, such regulations set up a "race for fish." The consequence has been dangerous fishing conditions, larger investments in boats and gear, a market glut and associated environmental damage. There are substantially better management techniques.In several places in the United States and globally, fishermen have been given the right conservation incentives and accountability to fish more efficiently, conserve the resource and bring in better quality fish at a higher price. Similar to the current plight of U.S. Pacific groundfish, British Columbia was experiencing steep declines in groundfish landings in the mid-1990s. As a result, fishermen were put under increased regulations, raced to bring in as many fish as possible and received a lower price for their fish when the market was flooded.In 1997, British Columbia launched a catch share program for their groundfish fleet. This program gave each boat a guaranteed "share" of the allowable rockfish catch for the year based on a combination of each vessel’s catch history and size. The guarantee allowed fishermen to fish at their own pace. Since they could fish when prices were best, they could make a higher profit on fewer fish. In 1996, 29,000 tons of groundfish were landed in British Columbia with revenues worth $21 million. In 2000, 26,000 tons of groundfish – 10 percent less than in 1996 – yielded more than a 60 percent increase in revenue, $34 million. And the program required a scientific observer to be aboard the boat, which provided better data about the health of the fishery and served as a basis for better fishery management decisions.A similar catch share program is up for vote by the Pacific Fishery Management Council in June. It is critical that the council get this one right. With the correct safeguards in place and tools for fishermen, Pacific groundfish can experience the same comeback as was experienced in British Columbia. Much depends on what opportunities and flexibility fishermen have to make the right choices about how much, and when, to fish. |
| Do You Make These Energy Mistakes? Don’t make these energy mistakes or you could be hurting and not helping your energy bill! |
| Energy Tax Credits A guide to understanding and utilizing energy tax credits. Make the most of your energy conscious purchases by knowing what qualifies for the tax credit. |
| Strategic oil reserves are alive and well Saudi prince says world has enough oil. |
| Press Release: Voinovich Proposes Legislation to Increase Global Warming Pollution for Decades FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Contact: Tony Kreindler, EDF, 202-572-3378 or 202-210-5791 (cell)(Washington — May 2, 2008) Ohio Senator George Voinovich today proposed to address the rapidly escalating threat of climate change by delaying meaningful federal action to control greenhouse gas emissions, obstructing existing state programs, and allowing U.S. global warming pollution to increase for decades to come. “This proposal can be summed up in one word: bankrupt,” said Steve Cochran, national climate campaign director at Environmental Defense Fund. “It’s a detailed prescription for doing nothing. If you think climate change is a hoax, this is your bill."
The plan outlined by Senator Voinovich today postpones meaningful action on greenhouse gas emissions for at least twenty years, calling for weak, non-binding emissions reduction benchmarks – current levels in 2020 and 1990 levels in 2030 – while providing taxpayer-funded subsidies for favored technologies. If the subsidies failed to achieve their goal, the Environmental Protection Agency could establish a cap and trade system to reduce emissions – but it could be suspended at the whim of the federal government, and it would come with an astonishingly low $5 per ton “safety valve” – an artificial price control on emissions reductions.
In the meantime, the proposal would take away state authority – confirmed by the U.S. Supreme Court in Massachusetts v. EPA – to control global warming pollution. Dozens of states across the country, including California, Florida, and the Northeast members of the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, have set ambitious emissions reduction targets.
Widespread scientific consensus holds that the U.S. needs to reduce emissions to roughly 80 percent below current levels by mid-century to help avoid the worst consequences of climate change. The U.S. can meet that target by reducing emissions by a manageable two percent per year – every year of delay will require steeper emissions cuts at a higher cost to the economy.
The Senate is expected to vote in early June on the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act (S. 2191), a bipartisan bill that puts an enforceable limit on pollution and puts the U.S. on a path to meeting science-based emissions reduction targets without harming the economy. The Energy Information Administration reported earlier this week that the bill’s mandatory cap and trade system would effectively reduce emissions without impacting strong long-term economic growth in the U.S.
“Senators looking for an environmentally effective and economically sound climate policy need to look no further than the Climate Security Act. Senator Voinovich’s proposal is just an escape route from credible action, and it leads to the same old expensive and ineffective policies that have already failed to curb emissions,” Cochran said. “It’s an attempt to block real action, and it’s only going to raise the price of fixing this problem down the road.”
###
About Environmental Defense Fund
A leading national nonprofit organization, Environmental Defense Fund represents more than 500,000 members. Since 1967, Environmental Defense Fund has linked science, economics, law and innovative private-sector partnerships to create breakthrough solutions to the most serious environmental problems. For more information, visit www.edf.org
|